How right Kalev Leetaru is on Wikipedia’s decision to ban The Daily Mail as a source.
This decision, he concludes, was made by a cabal of 50 editors based on anecdotes.
I’ve stated before on this blog how Wikipedia is broken, the abusive attitude of one of its editors, and how even luminaries like the late Aaron Swartz and Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger chose to depart. It’s just taken three years or more for some of these thoughts to get picked up in a more mainstream fashion...
Fifty editors at Wikipedia ban Daily Mail based on some anecdotes
Posted by lyceum under Social MediaFrom http://jackyan.com 2622 days ago
Made Hot by: logistico on February 18, 2017 11:52 pm
Who Voted for this Story
-
lyceum
-
bockmary7
-
blogexpert
-
thelastword
-
leonesimmy
-
mikehartman1
-
LoopLooper
-
justretweet
-
thecorneroffice
-
AmyJordan
-
JoshRed
-
advertglobal
-
Digitaladvert
-
logistico
-
brutusreportblogspot
-
2011tax
-
eScoutRoom
-
ISMagazine
-
FastSwings
-
2010Taxes
-
2012Taxes
-
Steve2014Taxes
-
2012tax
-
GotFreeBusinessCards2
-
2013Taxes
-
tiroberts
-
Frank_Fiedler
-
erikemanuelli
-
lisadavis09
Subscribe
“Javelyn: Thanks for sharing these ideas. I see the potential for a...”
“Adam: Thanks for your response and input on how to do posts reels on...”
“Yeah, that's a difficult one to solve.
There are a few things you can do,...”
“Mike: Attention grabbing headline! I will bookmark your post and read...”
“The hard thing with the timing, is if you have an international audience...”
Comments
2616 days ago