Digital Camera & Shooting Flowers

Posted by AnnEvanston under Products and Services
From http://susan-berland.com 4993 days ago

I find that inspiration comes from all places in business and we can often inspire others in unique ways!

Who Voted for this Story

Top BizSugar Users

This week's most active BizSugar users. Join Them!

Comments

Written by businessavante
4993 days ago

Great flower pics, Susan!

10 years ago I spent c$2500 on a manual Mamiya 6x4.5cm rollfilm camera (bigger negative than 35mm for better resolution) w/2 fixed lenses - normal & wide angle (for landscapes), a big tripod, and several 3" diameter (= expensive) filters. The negatives were great (I know, the pros used slides then, but I want a print I can hold in my hands), but the photo-finishers - including photo-only venues - never bothered to focus the enlarger. The resolution of the prints was equivalent to drugstore 35mm point-and-shoot. It almost ruined photography for me.

4 years ago I spent $240 on a Kodak point-and-shoot digital camera with image stabilization, and consistently get very crisp prints. Go figure!

Duncan

- 0 +

Written by SusanBerland
4987 days ago

I didn't spend quite that much on an SLR camera years ago and never learned to use it as you did. Bottom line for me, it was too heavy to carry around. I spent about double what you did for my point and shoot as I wanted as many features as possible without the weight and changeable lenses. You can see I get pretty good pictures! I'm so glad you liked them. Thank you.

- 0 +