A shorter URL has fewer characters than a longer one. So it makes sense to say that URL shorteners save space...
But is that true when we move from theory to practice?
Twitter Myth: URL Shorteners Save Space - Busted!
Posted by adrianjock under Social MediaFrom http://www.adrianjock.com 3484 days ago
Made Hot by: bloggerpalooza on May 12, 2015 11:17 pm
Who Voted for this Story
Subscribe
Comments
3480 days ago
3480 days ago
1) No, they weren't invented for SEO purposes. They were created in order to shorten long URLs. That's why they were called URL shorteners :)
2) Who needed short URLs?
For example, more than 10 years ago I used these services frequently in order to replace in emails long URLs. Otherwise, long URLs used to be trimmed in two useless pieces by the recipient's email client.
Some of my customers used these services in order to shorten the URLs from short ezine ads (such as top sponsor ads or ezine classified ads). Those ads had a limited length. By using short URLs, the advertisers had more space for the text of the ad (the longer the URL, the less space for the text)
Then Twitter was launched. Before the launch of Twitter's own t.co service, in the early days, URL shorteners such as TinyURL and then bit.ly were used on Twitter in order to get extra space ;-)
3484 days ago
3484 days ago
If the meaning was, "Why all the URL shortener services were created?" - the answer is that they were not created for Twitter purposes. Such services existed before Twitter's launch.